Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

master–servant rule

Read a random definition: Transportation Security Administration

A quick definition of master–servant rule:

The master-servant rule, also known as respondeat superior, is a legal concept that holds an employer or boss responsible for the actions of their employees or workers while they are on the job. This means that if an employee does something wrong while working, the employer can be held accountable for any harm caused. It's like saying that the boss is responsible for what their workers do.

A more thorough explanation:

The master-servant rule, also known as respondeat superior, is a legal doctrine that holds an employer or principal responsible for the wrongful acts committed by their employee or agent within the scope of their employment or agency.

For example, if a delivery driver causes an accident while making a delivery for their employer, the employer may be held liable for any damages or injuries caused by the driver's actions.

This rule is based on the idea that the employer or principal has control over the actions of their employees or agents and should therefore be responsible for any harm caused by those actions.

master–servant relationship | master's report

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:36
tap in
ClassyPleasantHeron
16:38
@PreviousSwelteringQuail: Hard to say. Some schools don't care or aren't organized in a way that a visit translates into interest. It won't hurt your chances, and it may be worth visiting just to see if you really can picture yourself there.
17:42
@PreviousSwelteringQuail: it does not help
Ijustwannagetinman
17:46
Georgetown updated my law hub to "applicant withdrawn" but never responded to my really long kind email explaining why I had to withdraw lol
Ijustwannagetinman
17:47
that's kinda rude I mean I understand though but wow
Ijustwannagetinman
17:51
Also if anyone cares, it seems spivey was right that we will see more Wairlist movement. UCLA and UVA are the only T14 that have truly been through their waitlists and both have already taken way more students than last year at this point. Definitely something to watch!
fwiw that's how its been for every school i withdrew from, or something like "application cancelled"
Both GW and Maine did respond to my withdrawal from them. BC and OSU did not.
anyone know if pre Aug 2024 LSAT writing can still be used after Aug 2024. haven't seen anything to the contrary but...
HumorousWaggishStoat
20:50
It can -think I saw the powerscore guy confirm on a reddit thread.
I don't see why it wouldn't, except that lsac love shit like that
21:19
UCLA's waitlist volume seems similar? 10 people logged a WL -> A result last cycle, 11 people this cycle
21:20
Scratch that, exactly 10 each cycle
21:21
Although it looks like half of UCLA's waitlist As last cycle (5/10) came in June or later, so looking more closely waitlist volume does seem up for UCLA
I got an email from Emory's Office of Financial aid saying they received my aid application. The email also said "Log into OPUS, Emory's student portal, to review our online service offerings and to review your To Do activities, important messages from the Office of Financial Aid, and later in the application cycle, your aid package and disbursement dates." I haven't been accepted (I'm waitlisted), does or did everyone receive this?
nvm should have read the bottom of the email
21:50
@Ijustwannagetinman: what did you write in your email?
i wanna get off a waitlist right NEOW 🗣️
TediousBrightPossum
1:44
These waitlists are killing me
WrongTalentedSpider
2:37
Hi - wondering people's thoughts on Hofstra law. They've given me full tuition but I'd have to maintain above 50% to keep it all. The thought of it is literally making me anxious and sick
That’s Predatory i wouldnt do it
8:16
agreed, if you have other options
8:17
50% of hofstra students lose their conditional scholarships after 1L according to lawschooltransparency
makes sense if they all have some sort of scholarship lol
I would only go to a school that makes their scholarships contingent on remaining in good standing aka passing
the school i decided on has conditional schollies but only 3% lose it. to me that's essentially just staying in good standing
8:56
i'd agree with that, the school i *think* going with is also just to remain in good standing, i don't think that's technically considered conditional
@cclaw: yeah it’s unconditional bc if youre not in good standing you get kicked out anyways lol
i actually love hofstra but if you cant afford to go to school for sticker then its not worth the conditional scholarship. i know some people are able to negotiate their way into unconditional scholarships/scholarships that depend on only good academic standing
thats an ungodly COA for that school though lol
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.