Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816)

Read a random definition: legal subrogation

A quick definition of Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816):

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) was a court case that decided that the Supreme Court of the United States has the power to overrule state courts when it comes to federal law. The case was about a land dispute between two people, Martin and Hunter's Lessee, and the Virginia State court ruled in favor of Hunter's Lessee. However, the Supreme Court said that the Virginia court was wrong and that federal law should be followed instead. This case made the Supreme Court the most powerful court in the United States and established its authority over state courts in matters of federal law.

A more thorough explanation:

Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee (1816) is a landmark Supreme Court case that established the Supreme Court’s authority over state courts in matters of federal law.

The case involved a land dispute between Martin and Hunter’s Lessee, which was initially decided in favor of Hunter’s Lessee by the Virginia Court of Appeals. However, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed this decision, which the Virginia State court rejected, stating that Section 25 of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court reconsidered the case and upheld the Judiciary Act, stating that questions of federal law were within the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction. The Court emphasized the importance of having a single, coherent interpretation of the Constitution and federal laws rather than multiple competing interpretations from various state courts.

This case established the Supreme Court’s supremacy in matters of constitutional interpretation and over state courts, making it the most powerful court in the United States.

For example, if a state court makes a decision that conflicts with federal law, the Supreme Court has the authority to overrule that decision and enforce federal law.

Martial Law | Maryland

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
I could do them really fast too then one day everyone stopped giving a fuck
what level soft is monkeying around
elmo you can drive my car
16:44
yes im gonna be a star
16:44
elmo u can drive my car
16:44
and baby i love u
21:55
Question: Which schools are most likely to be overrun with national guard/administration replaced with cronies
22:23
Greetings
22:26
Will to be me
22:28
So much for reaching out.....
Waking up feeling pretty damn justified on my opinions of the military idk about you guys
OrangeThing
16:43
Cool man
Commanders13
18:15
Has anyone worked with Spivey Consulting? Do you recommend working with them?
21:36
I have not, but I trust Mike/ them, I think they have a unique perspective (ex adcoms) and I think, based on their free info/analysis, they are a great group and could provide some value to most applicants.
21:36
@Commanders13: ^
hello
person4324
23:00
what do you guys think of retaking the LSAT in August after depositing at a law school starting in late august? I'm thinking if I get like a 179, I might reapply to law school
person4324
23:00
is it really bad to enroll at a school and then drop out because you think you'd have a better shot at a higher ranked school the next cycle?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:13
I'd be very careful with timing. If you're able to "drop out" prior to the start of classes, that's one thing, but it seems that admissions offices look very unkindly on applicants who "started" law school and left (absent very compelling circumstances, such as serious personal illness)
OlDirtyBtard
23:14
honestly if you arent feeling it then leave before you pay tuition or before classes start
OlDirtyBtard
23:14
i left right before i had to pay tuition many years ago and thankfully it didnt count as attending
OlDirtyBtard
23:14
i was not doing super hot so id have definitely suffered 1L
OlDirtyBtard
23:14
honestly man just dont go if youre not feeling itr
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:16
Don't forget that transferring is definitely an option, albeit not a guaranteed one
OlDirtyBtard
23:17
i mean not really anymore. oci isnt the main method of getting a job
23:43
100% what dirty said
23:44
Arangutan makes a good point as well. RnR, u know you have more gas in ur lsat tank if you are even considering what you are asking
person4324
0:09
ok this will be my 7th time taking it haha... idk if that factors in anything lol
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.