Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

jus oneris ferendi

Read a random definition: medium of exchange

A quick definition of jus oneris ferendi:

Term: JUS ONERIS FERENDI

Definition: Jus oneris ferendi is a legal term from Roman law that refers to a type of urban praedial servitude. This servitude allows a person's house to be supported by their neighbor's property. It is unique because it requires the neighbor to have a positive duty to provide support.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Jus oneris ferendi is a Latin term used in Roman law to refer to an urban praedial servitude that grants the right for one's own house to be supported by a neighbor's. This servitude is exceptional in that it requires a positive duty of the servient owner.

Example: An example of jus oneris ferendi would be if a homeowner's house was built on a slope and required additional support to prevent it from collapsing. The homeowner could obtain the right to have their neighbor's property support their house through the use of jus oneris ferendi.

This example illustrates how jus oneris ferendi can be used to grant a homeowner the right to have their neighbor's property support their own property. This servitude is unique in that it requires the servient owner to take on a positive duty to support their neighbor's property.

jus offerendi | jus persequendi in judicio quod sibi debetur

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
put it into perspective: my firm is a tier 1 law firm in chicago and consistently ranked and 90% of our attorneys went to kent
also side note: i forgot law schools that aren't aba-approved exist
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:04
90% of your attorneys went to Kent, but what perfect of Kent graduates are working at your firm (or making good money, or if not, getting their loans paid off by Kent)? the latter is, I'd argue, what matters more
i'm sorry i don't quite understand what you mean
16:09
if 90% of attorneys somewhere went to kent but you employ 10 attorneys, thats only 9 attorneys out of a possible 100+ class size at kent
16:09
i think is the point they are trying to get at
OHHH THANK U
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:09
lol thanks you explained better I was typing so much. it's a classic LR logical fallacy/trick, actually
16:10
Okay but clearly the point is that people act like going to a non t14 is a death sentence and it’s not
16:10
Okay but clearly the point is that people act like going to a non t14 is a death sentence and it’s not
16:10
yeah its not
16:10
i was only responding to that one specific thing i havent scrolled up
@esoterica: THAT'S WHAT i'M SAYING THANK U!!! my point was that you will be fine where you end up ❤️
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:11
100%, that's why I think the sub is untethered to reality. but/and I was aiming for tippy top schools, and I think it's not wild to have that goal if you have reasons :)
16:11
many people have different ideas of what a good outcome would be and have even more different ideas of what amount of work they would like to put to get there
Any acceptances today?
16:12
nop
16:12
couple yesterday
NosyBeagle
16:13
@DivergentBoundlessHuman: help i thought u meant BL as in boy love and not big law
NosyBeagle
16:13
it appears i have yaoi on the brain
16:13
Reddit in particular is so myopic about outcomes, there are large portions of the country where making 80k still gives you a comfortable life, and ~80k is often cited as the low end of the bimodal distribution of private attorney salaries
not saying reaching for a t-14 is a wild thing to do!!!! man i would go to nyu. i'm simply stating what esoterica said, people that act like not being at a t-14 means your life is over is simply not correct. but i think anyone outside of reddit would understand that.
fujos after stubbing their toe: YAOI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AngryMiniCar
16:16
LMAOO @badhorrormovie where did that even come from
AngryMiniCar
16:17
Also someone linked a redditpost here for RC wrong answer journals. I forgot who it was can you do it again :')
BEAGLE SAID YAOI and that popped into my brain i had to say something 💔 ,, also here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/v7w3ay/wrong_answer_guide_for_rc/
AngryMiniCar
16:25
THANK YOU!
UR WELCOME!!!! u will master rc we believe in u
AngryMiniCar
16:28
<3
let us take a moment to think about how the lsat was 10 sections when it was first created....glad they don't do that anymore that's for sure
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.