Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

judicio sisti

Read a random definition: single-registration rule

A quick definition of judicio sisti:

Term: Judicio Sisti

Definition: Judicio sisti is a Latin term that means "to be present in court." In Roman law, it refers to appearing in court or providing security for appearance in court. In Scots law, it is a type of caution that requires a claimant or principal debtor to appear in court whenever the opponent demands it. This caution is used in criminal cases and cases involving defendants who are foreigners or pose a flight risk. A caution is a security given to ensure the performance of some obligation, and the person who gives the security is called a cautioner.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Judicio sisti (joo-dish-ee-oh sis-tI) is a Latin term that means "to be present in court." In Roman law, it refers to appearance in court or security for appearance in court (vadimonium). In Scots law, it is a type of caution that requires a claimant or principal debtor to appear in court whenever the opponent demands it. This type of caution is used in some criminal cases and cases involving defendants who are foreigners or pose a flight risk.

Examples:

  • In Roman law, if a person was summoned to court, they had to judicio sisti, or appear in court.
  • In Roman law, a person could provide security for their appearance in court by giving vadimonium.
  • In Scots law, a claimant or principal debtor may be required to provide judicio sisti as a type of caution to ensure they appear in court when required.

These examples illustrate how judicio sisti was used in both Roman and Scots law to ensure that individuals appeared in court when required. In Roman law, it was either a requirement to appear in court or provide security for appearance, while in Scots law, it was a type of caution that required appearance in court whenever demanded.

judicia summaria | judicious

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
22:26
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: Deep/tough. Feels. Im well working on a project so im happy :)
22:28
should i hit the dmt pen in the sauna and meet god
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
Ooh what kind of project? Work, passion, neither, both?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
@NemoPropheta: do it do it
22:37
alright day before my lsat ill hit a blinker in the sauna and become one with the test
22:47
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: law school data so just passion.
22:47
@NemoPropheta: noo they drug test before the LSAT! U will get flagged!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:19
I'm intrigued llama
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
Holdddddup all that number crunching on your lsd profile is your work? Damn
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
2:21
While I am unsure of what option you are referring to, I personally just emailed each school and asked for them to hold my app pending my lsat score release.
2:22
Sorry WNE = Western New England not NEL|B
14:50
Hey guys is anyone online rn
14:51
I need adviceee
15:48
shooooot
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.