Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

IIED

Read a random definition: joint authors

A quick definition of IIED:

IIED stands for intentional infliction of emotional distress. It is when someone does something on purpose or recklessly that causes another person to feel really, really bad. This can include saying mean things or threatening to hurt someone in the future. To prove IIED, the person who was hurt has to show that the other person's behavior was really outrageous and caused them to feel so bad that it affected their mental health. However, sometimes people can say mean things and not be held responsible for IIED if they are just expressing their opinions or ideas. Different places have different rules about what counts as IIED.

A more thorough explanation:

IIED stands for intentional infliction of emotional distress. It is a type of tort that occurs when someone intentionally or recklessly causes another person to suffer severe emotional distress. This can include threats of future harm or other outrageous conduct.

In order for IIED to be proven, several elements must be present:

  • The defendant must have acted in an outrageous manner
  • The defendant must have acted intentionally or recklessly
  • The victim must have suffered severe emotional distress as a result
  • The defendant's conduct must have been the cause of the emotional distress

For example, if someone repeatedly yells insults at an actor in front of an audience, causing the actor to experience severe emotional distress, this could be considered IIED.

Free speech is protected by the First Amendment, which means that not all negative speech or criticism will qualify as IIED. In order for speech to be considered IIED, the person must go beyond simply criticizing someone and engage in truly outrageous conduct.

For example, if someone makes a speech expressing their dislike for a particular political figure, this would not be considered IIED. However, if they repeatedly make threats against that person's life, this could be considered IIED.

If the victim gave consent to the defendant to engage in the outrageous conduct, this may negate the IIED claim. Additionally, if the conduct occurred in a situation where it would be considered normal or appropriate, this may also negate the claim.

Different jurisdictions may have slightly different definitions and requirements for IIED. Some may expand liability to include emotional distress suffered by someone close to the intended victim.

In recent years, there has been a move away from imposing IIED liability, particularly in cases where the conduct in question involves matters of public concern. This is due to concerns about protecting free speech rights.

IEP | illegal

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:49
I got into Umiami
17:49
I dont want to go ther
17:58
i am the worst nu applicant bruh. i never did the initial interview and got the wl, and i never did the waitlist interview either lol
RebelMelodicLion
18:04
if someone does call vandy and asks pls lmk
@CallHerDaddy: give them a lap dance through the video interview, instant full ride
18:42
@Hellwoods2025: knew i loved you
@CallHerDaddy: <3
SuaveCrouton
22:38
Word on the street is vandy over admitted and so wont be drawing on much of the WL
22:41
Shhhhh @suave
22:41
We dont need that energy here
Any of y’all get hit with the back to back Cornell Rs
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:49
had some pineapples and pistachios for a snack
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:49
was really good
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:49
just letting chat know
What materials are you all using to prepare for 1L? I've heard of Law Hub and Barbri. Do you recommend any?
im chillin until the teachers start teaching
babybunny
8:58
thousand island stare rn
ripballs
10:11
BALLS IS BACK BABY FUCK ARARARAR
ripballs
10:11
@Hellwoods2025: LETS GOOOOO
@babybunny: nice
CTCSH
12:35
Free balls
@SpectacularDefiantMouse: JD adivisng! their prep course is completey free
15:38
Anyone here call or something and know if GULC is pretty full or still got a decent bit of room? O-O
Anyone here from ND
CTCSH
16:47
No, just asians and new yorkers
babybunny
18:07
i’m new york adjacent so it’s nice to feel included
18:35
Would you guys consider going to Law school out of state or should I try and stay In-state for cost?
18:41
It depends tbh. Can you get scholarships do you want to practice in your state what’s your debt tolerance… idk there’s a lot that goes into applying that needs to be considered. Personally I don’t wanna practice in my state and the schools in my state don’t transfer to the area(s) I would prefer to practice in I’d have been screwed had I stayed in state so in my case I definitely consider going out of state haha
18:45
In State would be Illinois, I don't quite know where I want to be though. Not applying till end of 2024.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
18:47
@TruthTheX: praying for your gulc uprising
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.