Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hoc ordine

Read a random definition: point

A quick definition of hoc ordine:

Term: HOC ORDINE

Definition: Hoc ordine means "in this order" in Law Latin. It is a historical term used to describe a specific order or sequence of events.

A more thorough explanation:

hoc ordine

hoc ordine (hok or-di-nee). [Law Latin] Hist. In this order.

hoc ordine is a Latin term used in legal contexts to refer to a specific order or sequence of events. It means "in this order" and is often used to describe the proper sequence of steps that must be taken in a legal process.

One example of the use of hoc ordine might be in a court case. The judge might instruct the lawyers to present their arguments hoc ordine, meaning that they must follow a specific order of presentation. Another example might be in a legal contract, where certain actions or events must occur hoc ordine in order for the contract to be valid.

For instance, a contract might state that payment must be made hoc ordine, meaning that the payment must be made before any goods or services are provided. This ensures that both parties are fulfilling their obligations in the proper order.

hoc nomine | hoc titulo

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
21:32
he cheated like michael larson on press your luck
Bettercaulsaul
22:33
What do you all do when you feel hopelessness overcome you while waiting for admissions ?
23:19
@NemoPropheta: from the anemone to the penthouse
June LSAT Today was easy as heck
globalcitizen
5:38
163
NosyBeagle
9:48
ayo should i have taken june then? what if august is crazy hard im scared
10:26
Stop being a pussy
10:26
Can’t change that now, it’s in the past
10:27
Two people on Reddit saying it was insanely hard
10:29
Although a couple saying it was easy…
10:37
all the tests are the same difficulty
10:37
everyone just thinks they’re different cause everyone is different levels of stupid
NosyBeagle
10:40
alright
11:06
Took the test and it felt alright, except proproctor interrupted me for 20 minutes on the real rc and I lost memory of the passage
11:07
in person is the move
NosyBeagle
11:08
im an in person truther
11:35
@steelrift99: same. bruh wat a joke
11:35
srry
11:48
honestly have no idea how I did compared to last LSAT.
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
12:28
Wait y'all both got stopped mid-RC? That's so crummy
12:29
I have a writing sample on file but it’s the old format, should I do argumentative writing?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
12:30
I think format is less important than demonstrating that you can write well unassisted
12:37
i’ll probably retake it since i have no idea how good it was
12:37
it was probably bad cause i was working full time on the hill and smoking way too much weed to handle all the stress
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
12:40
My understanding is that they basically want to make sure you can string sentences together unassisted—not even good arguments, flow, etc.—but I figure better safe than sorry
12:43
i no speak good
12:47
i think i wrote my writing sample in like 20 mins or something i blocked it out of my memory
12:47
i doubt it holds that much weight anyways
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.