Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Federal Tort Claims Act

Read a random definition: mancipium

A quick definition of Federal Tort Claims Act:

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is a law that allows people to sue the United States government for certain types of harm caused by its employees. This law makes the government responsible for the actions of its employees, like any other employer. However, the government is not responsible for intentional actions by its employees and cannot be made to pay extra money as punishment.

A more thorough explanation:

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is a law that allows individuals to sue the United States government for torts committed by its employees. A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or injury to another person. The FTCA applies to situations where the government would be held liable if it were a private person.

For example, if a postal worker causes a car accident while on the job, the injured party can sue the government under the FTCA. However, if a government employee intentionally harms someone, the FTCA does not apply.

The FTCA is important because it allows individuals to seek compensation for harm caused by the government. Without the FTCA, the government would be immune from most lawsuits, which would make it difficult for individuals to hold the government accountable for its actions.

federal tax law | Federal Trade Commission

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
19:25
Hi llama!!
21:15
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: How are you!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
tbh kinda losing my mind, I'm visiting my parents in my childhood home and whenever I do this I remember why I never do this aahhaha
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
My dog likes it here tho
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
How are youuuuu?
22:26
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: Deep/tough. Feels. Im well working on a project so im happy :)
22:28
should i hit the dmt pen in the sauna and meet god
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
Ooh what kind of project? Work, passion, neither, both?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
@NemoPropheta: do it do it
22:37
alright day before my lsat ill hit a blinker in the sauna and become one with the test
22:47
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: law school data so just passion.
22:47
@NemoPropheta: noo they drug test before the LSAT! U will get flagged!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:19
I'm intrigued llama
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
Holdddddup all that number crunching on your lsd profile is your work? Damn
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.