Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

estoppel in pais

Read a random definition: bare steerageway

A quick definition of estoppel in pais:

Estoppel in pais is a way to stop someone from using a right against another person if they got that right by tricking or misleading the other person. This is to make sure that people don't use the law to take advantage of others. For example, if someone lies to their partner and makes them think they are married, they can't later say they aren't married to keep from splitting their things in a divorce. Different states have different rules for when estoppel in pais can be used, but usually the person who was tricked has to have relied on the lies and been hurt by them.

A more thorough explanation:

Estoppel in pais, also known as equitable estoppel, is a legal defense that prevents a person from using a right against another person when that right arises from misleading actions. This doctrine was created to prevent someone from taking unfair advantage of another person through legal means.

For example, if someone leads their partner to believe that they are legally married, they cannot later use the illegitimacy of the marriage as an argument against splitting property in a divorce proceeding. This is because the partner relied on the misleading conduct of the other person and suffered harm as a result.

The requirements for estoppel in pais vary by state, but generally, the party claiming the right must have knowingly misled the other party, the other party must have relied on that conduct, and the other party must have suffered some harm. Some states require a higher standard of willful conduct, while others allow negligence to be sufficient for misleading someone. Additionally, the person using the estoppel defense must have reasonably relied on the misleading conduct of the other party.

Overall, estoppel in pais is a legal defense that prevents someone from using a right that arises from misleading conduct. This doctrine is meant to protect individuals from being taken advantage of through legal means.

estoppel by silence | et al.

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
NosyBeagle
19:28
Do tell
i had to drop out of a grad program but i explained it in my gpa addendum bc it was the same underlying event causing both
i was also named in a civil lawsuit that got dismissed but only one school asked about it
sorry probably not helpful
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
19:58
idk what the situations are, but you absolutely should write about them if the school asks about them—the only time you should be asking *whether* to write one is when you're not sure whether your situation qualifies as what they're asking about
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
19:59
better question is usually *how* to write about them
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:00
I had to write about write
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:01
... write-ups at work (petty, and they were removed from my file after a year, but even so the app asked so I wrote)
NosyBeagle
20:05
Ah it cancelled out my msg cus I switched tabs. But I’ll just tell you guys cus I get mixed answers: a) accused of cheating on a calc exam freshman year but was cleared of wrongdoing, b) sent to the hospital senior year because I go too drunk
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:12
Seems like you'd need to write about A because it went through a formal process, but it shouldn't hurt you if you explain it straightforwardly and explain you were cleared (just don't be weirdly salty about it like you're holding a grudge)
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:12
Re B, did this involve school in any way? Is there an app that has a C&F question that you think this applies to?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:13
Maybe you're not deep enough into the process to know this—each school has its own unique set of C&F questions, so you should disclose exactly what they ask about, no more, no less
NosyBeagle
20:14
OH
NosyBeagle
20:14
Ok why did I think it was just gonna be one type of q for all. My bad folks. Ignore my info dump
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:16
No worries! Frankly I think it's wild that applications have weird hidden quirks that you don't know about until you're actually logged into LSAC working through the app. There's some info you can find about the oddball/unique questions you'll find on specific apps, so you might want to look for that for schools you're going to apply to
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:17
Like on various consultants' blogs, reddit, etc
NosyBeagle
20:17
🫡 thank you good sir or ma’am or bam
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
20:17
Ooh can I be a bam
NosyBeagle
20:39
You may
20:45
ima write my personal statement about being fired and how that made me want to do law but it would be funny if I also had to write an addendum about it
20:45
turns out defense companies don’t like it when you question the war machine 🙏
20:46
“What are your opinions on Edward Snowden” - my boss
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
21:02
I wrote optional essays about a situation that affected my undergrad performance. For any school that required an "education gap addendum" I was basically like "pls see my optional essay"
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
21:02
¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
NosyBeagle
21:12
did they accept that?
NosyBeagle
21:12
that reminds me of filling out job apps and they want you to type out your resume in a text box. like huh??? open the pdf, idiots
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
21:18
I mean I was nicer about it—I'd put a couple of sentences explaining it super lo-res, and then I said something like "I speak to this situation in detail in my optional essay."
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
21:20
They don't send your application back to you and tell you to redo an addendum if they don't like it, so the only way to know whether they "accepted" it, as it were, is admissions results
Bettercaulsaul
22:28
Helpful video I found https://youtu.be/2ZVrX6DTSKU?si=KsZeWbF4_fJuqKl5
23:17
who up lsdin they law
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.