Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

equipment trust certificate

Read a random definition: jus gentium publicum

A quick definition of equipment trust certificate:

An equipment trust certificate is a type of security that is usually issued by a railroad company to pay for new equipment. The certificate allows the company to hold title to the equipment through a trustee until the note has been fully paid off. It is also known as a car trust certificate or trust certificate.

A more thorough explanation:

An equipment trust certificate is a type of security that is typically issued by a railroad company to finance the purchase of new equipment. The certificate represents a debt obligation that is secured by the equipment itself. The title to the equipment is held by a trustee until the debt has been fully paid off.

For example, a railroad company may issue an equipment trust certificate to finance the purchase of new locomotives. The certificate would be sold to investors, who would receive regular interest payments until the debt is fully repaid. The title to the locomotives would be held by a trustee until the debt is fully paid off, at which point the title would transfer to the railroad company.

Another example of an equipment trust certificate is a car trust certificate, which is a similar type of security used to finance the purchase of automobiles or other vehicles.

These examples illustrate how an equipment trust certificate works by providing a way for companies to finance the purchase of expensive equipment without having to pay for it all upfront. The certificate allows investors to provide the necessary funds, while the equipment itself serves as collateral to ensure that the debt is repaid.

equipment | equitable abstention

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
AngryMiniCar
15:49
LMFAOO
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:50
that's fair! although section stacking is real---that part scared me a lot when applying. the near-guarantee of good outcomes no matter where in your class you end up is, I think, what is attractive to many about the T14
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:51
at least that's why those schools were my goal, especially as a risk-averse older applicant. I have fewer years between now and retirement during which to pay off loans and then earn enough money to be able to stop working before I die lol
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:51
that said, I still find most redditors to be... ungrounded, let's say
put it into perspective: my firm is a tier 1 law firm in chicago and consistently ranked and 90% of our attorneys went to kent
also side note: i forgot law schools that aren't aba-approved exist
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:04
90% of your attorneys went to Kent, but what perfect of Kent graduates are working at your firm (or making good money, or if not, getting their loans paid off by Kent)? the latter is, I'd argue, what matters more
i'm sorry i don't quite understand what you mean
16:09
if 90% of attorneys somewhere went to kent but you employ 10 attorneys, thats only 9 attorneys out of a possible 100+ class size at kent
16:09
i think is the point they are trying to get at
OHHH THANK U
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:09
lol thanks you explained better I was typing so much. it's a classic LR logical fallacy/trick, actually
16:10
Okay but clearly the point is that people act like going to a non t14 is a death sentence and it’s not
16:10
Okay but clearly the point is that people act like going to a non t14 is a death sentence and it’s not
16:10
yeah its not
16:10
i was only responding to that one specific thing i havent scrolled up
@esoterica: THAT'S WHAT i'M SAYING THANK U!!! my point was that you will be fine where you end up ❤️
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:11
100%, that's why I think the sub is untethered to reality. but/and I was aiming for tippy top schools, and I think it's not wild to have that goal if you have reasons :)
16:11
many people have different ideas of what a good outcome would be and have even more different ideas of what amount of work they would like to put to get there
Any acceptances today?
16:12
nop
16:12
couple yesterday
NosyBeagle
16:13
@DivergentBoundlessHuman: help i thought u meant BL as in boy love and not big law
NosyBeagle
16:13
it appears i have yaoi on the brain
16:13
Reddit in particular is so myopic about outcomes, there are large portions of the country where making 80k still gives you a comfortable life, and ~80k is often cited as the low end of the bimodal distribution of private attorney salaries
not saying reaching for a t-14 is a wild thing to do!!!! man i would go to nyu. i'm simply stating what esoterica said, people that act like not being at a t-14 means your life is over is simply not correct. but i think anyone outside of reddit would understand that.
fujos after stubbing their toe: YAOI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AngryMiniCar
16:16
LMAOO @badhorrormovie where did that even come from
AngryMiniCar
16:17
Also someone linked a redditpost here for RC wrong answer journals. I forgot who it was can you do it again :')
BEAGLE SAID YAOI and that popped into my brain i had to say something 💔 ,, also here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/v7w3ay/wrong_answer_guide_for_rc/
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.