!-- Google Tag Manager (noscript) -->

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

 
LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cum virginitas vel castitas corrupta restitui non possit

Read a random definition: answer

A quick definition of cum virginitas vel castitas corrupta restitui non possit:

Term: Cum Virginitas Vel Castitas Corrupta Restitui Non Possit

Definition: This Latin phrase means that once someone's virginity or chastity has been violated, it cannot be restored. This phrase was used in history and Scots law to explain why severe punishment was imposed for rape.

A more thorough explanation:

Cum Virginitas Vel Castitas Corrupta Restitui Non Possit

Cum virginitas vel castitas corrupta restitui non possit is a Latin phrase used in historical and Scots law. It means that once virginity or chastity is violated, it cannot be restored.

The phrase was used to explain why severe punishment was imposed for rape. If someone violates another person's virginity or chastity, the damage cannot be undone. The victim's purity and innocence are forever lost, and they may suffer physical and emotional trauma that can last a lifetime.

For example, if a person is raped, they may experience physical injuries, sexually transmitted infections, unwanted pregnancy, and psychological distress. Even if the perpetrator is caught and punished, the victim cannot regain their virginity or chastity.

This phrase emphasizes the importance of respecting other people's bodies and autonomy. It also highlights the need for society to protect vulnerable individuals from sexual violence and hold perpetrators accountable for their actions.

cumulative zoning | CUPOS

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
@AcousticUnequalYak: how have you struck out with the majority of schools already?
the cycle just started
[] baddestbunny
19:57
guys serious question
[] baddestbunny
19:57
With respect to graduate or professional school, are you or will you be in the first generation of (i) your immediate family, or (ii) the household(s) in which you grew up, to graduate from such a school?
[] baddestbunny
19:58
sorry that's not the question
1a2b3c4d26z
19:58
nope
[] baddestbunny
19:58
do you think non-custodial parent counts here?
[] baddestbunny
19:58
like they are immediate family but I didn't grow up with them
1a2b3c4d26z
19:58
Sure yea
Hmm. If this Q is on a law school application it depends on what constitutes immediate family.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:58
Feel like that's an inclusive or
[] baddestbunny
19:59
yeah I was trying to decide if it was meant to be inclusive
Oh wait the second part is household you grew up in. So, I think the answer would be yes.
[] baddestbunny
19:59
like my answer is no to the first one, yes to the second one
1a2b3c4d26z
19:59
I don't think a) anyone will find out whether you consider it inclusive nor b) care
1a2b3c4d26z
19:59
so go for it
1a2b3c4d26z
19:59
Not legal advice
[] baddestbunny
19:59
haha
windyMagician
20:03
i would say yes, if they wanted it to be inclusive they should have said and/or
windyMagician
20:04
this is like an lr question
[] baddestbunny
20:04
the or was italicized originally if that helps at all
1a2b3c4d26z
20:05
Then it's totally inclusive
[] baddestbunny
20:06
see that's what UVA says
[] baddestbunny
20:06
Duke says: Will you be a first-generation professional student (i.e., none of your parent(s) or the people who raised you have a degree beyond the bachelor's level)?
[] baddestbunny
20:07
so my answer to that I think is no
[] baddestbunny
20:07
but it's all so complicated
1a2b3c4d26z
20:07
No bergly yet again :(
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
20:10
borkley is giving me major blue balls rn
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.