Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cross-claim

Read a random definition: investment bank

A quick definition of cross-claim:

A cross-claim is when one person sues another person who is also involved in the same problem. For example, if two people are being sued for a car accident, one person might sue the other person for money to pay for the damages. This is called a cross-claim. It is only allowed if it is related to the original problem. For instance, if one person is found responsible for the accident, they might ask the other person to pay for some of the damages.

A more thorough explanation:

A cross-claim is a legal claim made by one party against another party who is also involved in the same lawsuit.

For example, if two people are suing a third person for damages caused in a car accident, one of the plaintiffs may make a cross-claim against the other plaintiff for their share of the damages.

Cross-claims are governed by Rule 13 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). According to this rule, cross-claims are only allowed if they arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original claim.

For instance, if a defendant is being sued for breach of contract, they may make a cross-claim against the plaintiff for breach of the same contract.

Another example of a permissible cross-claim is a claim for indemnification. If a party is found liable for damages in the original claim, they may make a cross-claim against another party to recover some or all of the damages.

Overall, cross-claims are a way for parties involved in a lawsuit to resolve all of their legal disputes in one proceeding.

cross-appeal | cross-complaint

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
eggan
16:14
ok but like.... how many people are doing that. you dont actually know do you
eggan
16:14
if you had a source that would be different
TONS lmfao especially asians who, like that columbia hoe, need them to "slow down"
AngryMiniCar
16:15
Not my entire race lmao
DarioDarko
16:15
Okay so this is a racist thing
eggan
16:15
ok lol ok im done engaging. anyway. hows everyones date
GO look at biglaw lawyers complaing about the crops since 2022 when the 2019 lsat changes started to impact things, they notice they need 16 hours to do what a 2008 grad did in 8
eggan
16:15
day*
AngryMiniCar
16:16
good until I got a -16 on RC cause I can't read. Lowkey paradoxical because LRs I get -1/-3
AngryMiniCar
16:16
Hbu lol
Usually -0 LG -0 LR -2 Rc
AngryMiniCar
16:16
Gimme some of that
eggan
16:16
ooo i have advice from a 169 scorer. basically with RC the main things you need to do to prepare are to pretend what youre reading is the most interesting thing ever, and prepare by reading more fiction (for adults)
eggan
16:17
novels like metamorphosis, brave new world, no longer human, crime & punishment, those kinds of novels for adults with complex language structure will be helpful (im just listing books i like but you can read anything)
Read moby dick
NosyBeagle
16:18
@AngryMiniCar: ill trade u for your lr score lol
NosyBeagle
16:18
@windyMagician: sounds good. I will start doing this
AngryMiniCar
16:18
Naww I worked my asssss off for that LR result
NosyBeagle
16:18
lmaooo
eggan
16:19
you atted windy lol you probably meant to at me but thats ok
Also also, at the same time, the biglaw lawyers increasingly are going "fuck these t30 hires are really good (the non accommodated 160s who would be t14 people in 2008 over these accommodated 170s in the t14 lmfao)" lolololol Also for RC just the more you do the better you are.
AngryMiniCar
16:20
@eggan: thanks! I'll do that.
16:20
Sometimes my mind just goes blank when staring at an RC passage
16:21
what helped me most for RC was that the right answer will always be in the passage, even if its only implied
16:21
so you just have to justify your answer choice with specific line support
NosyBeagle
16:21
maybe i forgot who i was talking to. you can't scroll after a bit lol
@PremiumFrequentCrane: i dont have accomodations you absolute buffoon
NosyBeagle
16:22
trying to see if i have it in me to do another lr set
NosyBeagle
16:23
the best i've done on lr has been -10. I have a long way to go
@NosyBeagle: you need to be drilling weak question types and not doing full sets if you're at -10
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.