Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

commingled goods

Read a random definition: latinarius

A quick definition of commingled goods:

Commingled goods are things that have been mixed together so much that you can't tell what they were before. For example, when you make bread, the flour becomes commingled with other ingredients. This can be a problem when people have different rights to the goods that have been mixed together. The law says that if someone has a right to one of the original goods, they also have a right to the new thing that was made from all the mixed-up goods. But if more than one person has a right to the original goods, it can be hard to figure out who has the most important right to the new thing.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Commingled goods are goods that have been physically combined with other goods to the point where their original identity is lost. For example, when flour is used to make bread, it becomes a commingled good.

When goods become commingled, it can create complications in secured transactions. Independent security interests cannot exist in commingled goods, but they can exist in the product or mass that is created from the commingled goods. If a good with a security interest becomes commingled, a security interest is created in the new product.

For example, if a farmer has a security interest in a specific type of grain, and that grain is used to make bread, the farmer's security interest would extend to the bread that is produced. This can create issues when multiple security interests exist in the commingled goods, such as when yeast, water, and flour are combined to make bread.

To resolve these issues, UCC §9-336 creates a priority system for security interests in products or masses. Perfected security interests take priority over unperfected security interests, and if multiple perfected security interests exist, the interest with greater value before the goods were commingled takes priority.

Commingled goods are different from accessions, which occur when goods are combined but their original identity is not lost. For example, if a car is fitted with new tires, the tires are an accession to the car, but the car's original identity is not lost.

commercial tort claim | commingling

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
19:25
Hi llama!!
21:15
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: How are you!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
tbh kinda losing my mind, I'm visiting my parents in my childhood home and whenever I do this I remember why I never do this aahhaha
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
My dog likes it here tho
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:02
How are youuuuu?
22:26
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: Deep/tough. Feels. Im well working on a project so im happy :)
22:28
should i hit the dmt pen in the sauna and meet god
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
Ooh what kind of project? Work, passion, neither, both?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
22:31
@NemoPropheta: do it do it
22:37
alright day before my lsat ill hit a blinker in the sauna and become one with the test
22:47
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: law school data so just passion.
22:47
@NemoPropheta: noo they drug test before the LSAT! U will get flagged!
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:19
I'm intrigued llama
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
Holdddddup all that number crunching on your lsd profile is your work? Damn
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
23:21
I don't visit y'all's profiles enough, clearly
NarrowFaithfulCougar
0:22
@NemoPropheta: Ahh yeah, the Sauna. That's some good Nordic shit. Beats the hot tub hands down. Plus everyone is naked.
1:23
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: got that weaponized autism in gear, we out here.
@llama: your cycle confuses me, your stats are good and you applied early but all of those Rs? Is there anything weird about your app?
do you have C&F issues or something?
also ur first choice is kansas but you didnt apply there?
12:55
@RasheedWallaceFan: Hi. Yes, I waited for April LSAT, put almost all apps (which were sent really early) so that basically most of my apps were reviewed In May. Shot myself in the foot for 155 -> 161 lmao. Would not recommend 10/10
12:57
@RasheedWallaceFan: unironically, KSLS was my top choice, however by April LSAT their app had closed. It was like waiting to date ur dream partner, but waiting until you graduate uni, then by the time u graduate uni, your soul mate is already married with 2.4 kids and 1.6 dogs. Heartbreak.exe fr fr
12:58
are you R&Ring?
13:00
No, I think what I will do is flip a coin: heds NKU, tails NEL|B what u guys think bout dat. Then once 1L - if good at LS, try to transfer, if bad at LS or one of my grandiose ideas/inventions are viable, drop out and pursue.
oh so you submitted the apps with a lower lsat and then retook
got it
Bettercaulsaul
13:33
Most schools will hold your application for the next test score to be released into your account as well. I was notified by an admissions director that if a decision is processed they will not retroactively go back for the new score even if higher
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
I vote NEL-Boston so we can be friends :D
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:34
But it says you withdrew?? :(
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:41
@Bettercaulsaul: in my experience, there is often an option on the application for you to choose whether you'd like them to review your application as-is ASAP or hold it until your new score is released. but it probably varies by school—I just remember seeing that option on at least a few app forms
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.