Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cf.

Read a random definition: intercalare

A quick definition of cf.:

Term: cf.

Definition: Cf. is a short way of saying "compare." It's used to show that a source supports a different idea than what was just said. It's important to compare the two ideas and see how they're different. If a source is marked with cf., it doesn't mean it contradicts what was just said, but it's worth looking at to see how it's related. If a source does contradict what was just said, a negative signal should be used instead.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Cf. is an abbreviation for the Latin word confer, which means "compare." It is used to signal that the cited source supports a different claim than the one just made, and that it is worthwhile to compare the two claims and assess the difference. When using cf., it is encouraged to provide parenthetical explanations to explain how the source relates to the text. It is important to note that a cf. source simply offers a different yet non-contradictory claim, and actual support to the claim just made should not be assumed. If the source gives a contradictory claim, a negative signal should be used.

Example 1: "The study found that eating a diet high in fruits and vegetables can reduce the risk of heart disease. Cf. another study that found no significant difference in heart disease risk between those who ate a high fruit and vegetable diet and those who did not." In this example, the use of cf. signals that there is a different claim being made in the other study, and it is worth comparing the two claims to assess the difference.

Example 2: "The author argues that the death penalty is an effective deterrent to crime. Cf. a study that found no evidence to support this claim." In this example, the use of cf. signals that there is a contradictory claim being made in the study, and a negative signal should be used to indicate that the claim is not supported.

These examples illustrate how cf. is used to signal a different claim and encourage comparison and assessment of the difference between claims. It is important to use cf. carefully and accurately to avoid assuming support for a claim that may not be present in the cited source.

certiorari | chain of title

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
eggan
16:14
ok but like.... how many people are doing that. you dont actually know do you
eggan
16:14
if you had a source that would be different
TONS lmfao especially asians who, like that columbia hoe, need them to "slow down"
AngryMiniCar
16:15
Not my entire race lmao
DarioDarko
16:15
Okay so this is a racist thing
eggan
16:15
ok lol ok im done engaging. anyway. hows everyones date
GO look at biglaw lawyers complaing about the crops since 2022 when the 2019 lsat changes started to impact things, they notice they need 16 hours to do what a 2008 grad did in 8
eggan
16:15
day*
AngryMiniCar
16:16
good until I got a -16 on RC cause I can't read. Lowkey paradoxical because LRs I get -1/-3
AngryMiniCar
16:16
Hbu lol
Usually -0 LG -0 LR -2 Rc
AngryMiniCar
16:16
Gimme some of that
eggan
16:16
ooo i have advice from a 169 scorer. basically with RC the main things you need to do to prepare are to pretend what youre reading is the most interesting thing ever, and prepare by reading more fiction (for adults)
eggan
16:17
novels like metamorphosis, brave new world, no longer human, crime & punishment, those kinds of novels for adults with complex language structure will be helpful (im just listing books i like but you can read anything)
Read moby dick
NosyBeagle
16:18
@AngryMiniCar: ill trade u for your lr score lol
NosyBeagle
16:18
@windyMagician: sounds good. I will start doing this
AngryMiniCar
16:18
Naww I worked my asssss off for that LR result
NosyBeagle
16:18
lmaooo
eggan
16:19
you atted windy lol you probably meant to at me but thats ok
Also also, at the same time, the biglaw lawyers increasingly are going "fuck these t30 hires are really good (the non accommodated 160s who would be t14 people in 2008 over these accommodated 170s in the t14 lmfao)" lolololol Also for RC just the more you do the better you are.
AngryMiniCar
16:20
@eggan: thanks! I'll do that.
16:20
Sometimes my mind just goes blank when staring at an RC passage
16:21
what helped me most for RC was that the right answer will always be in the passage, even if its only implied
16:21
so you just have to justify your answer choice with specific line support
NosyBeagle
16:21
maybe i forgot who i was talking to. you can't scroll after a bit lol
@PremiumFrequentCrane: i dont have accomodations you absolute buffoon
NosyBeagle
16:22
trying to see if i have it in me to do another lr set
NosyBeagle
16:23
the best i've done on lr has been -10. I have a long way to go
@NosyBeagle: you need to be drilling weak question types and not doing full sets if you're at -10
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.