Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cash-equivalent doctrine

Read a random definition: bottomland

A quick definition of cash-equivalent doctrine:

The cash-equivalent doctrine is a rule in taxes that says you have to report all the money you make, even if you didn't get paid in cash. This means that if you trade something for goods or services instead of money, you still have to tell the government how much you made.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The cash-equivalent doctrine is a tax principle that requires individuals to report income even if it is not in the form of cash. This means that if a taxpayer receives non-cash payments, such as goods or services, they must still report the fair market value of those payments as income on their tax return.

Example 1: John is a freelance graphic designer who agrees to design a website for a local restaurant in exchange for a year's worth of free meals. Even though John did not receive cash for his services, he must still report the fair market value of the meals he received as income on his tax return.

Example 2: Sarah is a musician who performs at a local bar in exchange for a percentage of the bar's profits for the night. Even though Sarah did not receive cash for her performance, she must still report the fair market value of her share of the profits as income on her tax return.

These examples illustrate how the cash-equivalent doctrine applies to non-cash payments. Even though the payments are not in the form of cash, they still have value and must be reported as income for tax purposes.

cash equivalent | cash-expenditure method

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
21:32
he cheated like michael larson on press your luck
Bettercaulsaul
22:33
What do you all do when you feel hopelessness overcome you while waiting for admissions ?
23:19
@NemoPropheta: from the anemone to the penthouse
June LSAT Today was easy as heck
globalcitizen
5:38
163
NosyBeagle
9:48
ayo should i have taken june then? what if august is crazy hard im scared
10:26
Stop being a pussy
10:26
Can’t change that now, it’s in the past
10:27
Two people on Reddit saying it was insanely hard
10:29
Although a couple saying it was easy…
10:37
all the tests are the same difficulty
10:37
everyone just thinks they’re different cause everyone is different levels of stupid
NosyBeagle
10:40
alright
11:06
Took the test and it felt alright, except proproctor interrupted me for 20 minutes on the real rc and I lost memory of the passage
11:07
in person is the move
NosyBeagle
11:08
im an in person truther
11:35
@steelrift99: same. bruh wat a joke
11:35
srry
11:48
honestly have no idea how I did compared to last LSAT.
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
12:28
Wait y'all both got stopped mid-RC? That's so crummy
12:29
I have a writing sample on file but it’s the old format, should I do argumentative writing?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
12:30
I think format is less important than demonstrating that you can write well unassisted
12:37
i’ll probably retake it since i have no idea how good it was
12:37
it was probably bad cause i was working full time on the hill and smoking way too much weed to handle all the stress
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
12:40
My understanding is that they basically want to make sure you can string sentences together unassisted—not even good arguments, flow, etc.—but I figure better safe than sorry
12:43
i no speak good
12:47
i think i wrote my writing sample in like 20 mins or something i blocked it out of my memory
12:47
i doubt it holds that much weight anyways
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.