Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Content Requirements and Opt-Out

Read a random definition: Uniform Resource Locator (URL)

A quick definition of Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Content Requirements and Opt-Out:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 requires that any commercial electronic message must include certain information. This includes identifying the sender and any person on whose behalf the message is sent, providing contact information for the sender or person on whose behalf the message is sent, and including an unsubscribe mechanism for recipients to opt-out of future messages. The unsubscribe mechanism must include an electronic or website address that is free to use and must be effectuated promptly, no later than 10 business days after the recipient indicates their wish to opt-out. The contact information and opt-out mechanism must remain valid for at least 60 days after the message is sent.

A more thorough explanation:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 has certain requirements for "commercial electronic messages". These messages must:

  • Identify the sender and any person on whose behalf the message is sent
  • Provide contact information for the sender or the person on whose behalf the message is sent
  • Include an "unsubscribe mechanism" for opting out of future messages

The "unsubscribe mechanism" must include an electronic or website address that can be used to indicate the wish to unsubscribe. Both the sender and the person on whose behalf the message is sent are responsible for ensuring that the opt-out is effectuated promptly, within 10 business days. They must also ensure that the contact information and opt-out address remain valid for at least 60 days after the message is sent.

An example of a commercial electronic message that would need to comply with the Canadian Anti-Spam Law would be an email from a company promoting a new product. The email would need to include the name of the company and any other person on whose behalf the message is sent, such as a marketing agency. It would also need to provide contact information for the company or agency, such as a phone number or email address. Finally, it would need to include an opt-out mechanism, such as a link to unsubscribe from future emails.

If the recipient of the email chooses to opt-out, the sender and the person on whose behalf the message is sent must ensure that the opt-out is processed within 10 business days. They must also ensure that the contact information and opt-out address remain valid for at least 60 days after the email is sent.

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Administrative Framework | Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Core Requirements

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:01
@NemoPropheta: its hot outside. its hot inside. sweating. less clothes.
16:17
literally yeah it gets hot
16:17
dudes go shirtless and i cant wear a sports bra?
16:19
i also hate the feeling of sweaty clothes lol
@llama: have you ever considered not going to law school and working for spivey instead
dudes are going shirtless in the gym? i gotta get on that
16:37
u can go shirtless in my gym 😛
are there monkey bars?
we gotta bring those back
no one monkeying around anymore
I could do them really fast too then one day everyone stopped giving a fuck
what level soft is monkeying around
elmo you can drive my car
16:44
yes im gonna be a star
16:44
elmo u can drive my car
16:44
and baby i love u
21:55
Question: Which schools are most likely to be overrun with national guard/administration replaced with cronies
22:23
Greetings
22:26
Will to be me
22:28
So much for reaching out.....
Waking up feeling pretty damn justified on my opinions of the military idk about you guys
OrangeThing
16:43
Cool man
Commanders13
18:15
Has anyone worked with Spivey Consulting? Do you recommend working with them?
21:36
I have not, but I trust Mike/ them, I think they have a unique perspective (ex adcoms) and I think, based on their free info/analysis, they are a great group and could provide some value to most applicants.
21:36
@Commanders13: ^
hello
person4324
23:00
what do you guys think of retaking the LSAT in August after depositing at a law school starting in late august? I'm thinking if I get like a 179, I might reapply to law school
person4324
23:00
is it really bad to enroll at a school and then drop out because you think you'd have a better shot at a higher ranked school the next cycle?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.