Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

authorities

Read a random definition: McCarran Internal Security Act

A quick definition of authorities:

Authorities are either previous decisions made by courts that guide current legal cases or law enforcement officials, such as the police. When lawyers argue their case in court, they often refer to past cases as "authorities" to support their arguments. If someone needs help from the police, they might say they need to call the authorities.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Authorities can refer to:

  1. Previous decisions made by courts of appeal that provide legal guidance to a court on questions in a current lawsuit. These previous decisions are called "precedents." Lawyers often use these precedents as "points and authorities" in their legal arguments. For example, a lawyer might cite a previous case as an authority for their legal position.
  2. Law enforcement, such as the police. For example, someone might say "I'm going to call the authorities" if they need help from the police.

Examples:

  • Example 1: In a court case, a lawyer might cite a previous case where a similar legal issue was decided in favor of their client. They would use this previous case as an authority to support their argument.
  • Example 2: If someone witnesses a crime, they might call the authorities (i.e. the police) to report it.

Explanation: The term "authorities" can refer to legal precedents that lawyers use to support their arguments in court, or it can refer to law enforcement, such as the police. In both examples, the term "authorities" is used to refer to a source of help or guidance. In the legal example, the lawyer is using previous court decisions as a source of guidance for their argument. In the law enforcement example, the person is calling the police for help in a situation where they need assistance.

attorney's work product | bifurcation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:04
good to know. is the Distinguished Scholar full ride?
CynicalLameFop
18:04
ya
18:04
I see if you appied with waved scholarship do you think that would have helped
CynicalLameFop
18:04
prolly
info-man
18:04
i think the common wisdom is that ED helps convey extreme interest but puts the applicant at a disadvantage from an aid perspective, assuming a significant amount of aid isn't provided
18:05
^ I figured this but I was curious for how much it helps
info-man
18:05
not sure there's any meaningful empirical evidence we could use to determine that
18:05
part of me thinks it should help quite like undergrade but I hear diff things
18:06
@info-man: that makes sense
18:06
Im a spliter so i was hoping ED would help
[] texaslawhopefully
18:07
I’m sure they help somewhat with admissions. I personally wouldn’t do it because aid matters, but if you can afford sticker price and really want to go to x school, then it could be worth it.
info-man
18:07
i don't believe it provides the same boost as it does in undergrad admissions
CynicalLameFop
18:07
Yeah thats why I did one of the ones that was full tuition. Figured absolutely no way that could hurt me
18:07
All good things to think of. Aid doesn't matter too much for me because I got a full ride for undergrade
18:08
so I would like to get into the best law school I can
[] texaslawhopefully
18:08
@Kilajen: if that’s goal, with your gpa why not retake the lsat?
[] ABCarrot321
18:09
my understanding of early admissions is that if you're already in the median ranges it will help you, but otherwise isn't a boost.
18:10
I see
18:11
I didnt want to retake it becasue the removed the games
18:11
and I was the best at games
info-man
18:11
yeah, i agree with carrot. not really a reason why you shouldn't attempt the exam again after additional preparation, even if your goal is to make it into the 160s
[] ABCarrot321
18:11
a 154 is totally a score that can be raised by studying for a bit
18:12
but what if I get lower?
18:12
then I would be really screwed
info-man
18:12
alright but what if you get higher
[] ABCarrot321
18:12
anecdotal but I've never seen someone score lower on their second test if they've genuinely devoted time to studying
[] texaslawhopefully
18:12
What sort of schools are you aiming for? My unsolicited advice would be I highly highly recommend retaking. It’s very possible to improve your score even with the new lsat and I think you would be wasting your great gpa with your current lsat.
18:12
I would agree with that if they didn't remove my strongest section
[] ABCarrot321
18:13
LR is highly learnable too
info-man
18:13
have you taken a diagnostic with 2LR 1RC?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.