Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Alford plea

Read a random definition: No signal

A quick definition of Alford plea:

An Alford plea is when someone in court admits they are guilty of a crime, but they also say they are innocent. This is different from saying "I don't know if I'm guilty or not." The person who makes an Alford plea agrees to be punished for the crime, even though they say they didn't do it. This kind of plea is not allowed in some states, and it can be used against the person in future cases.

A more thorough explanation:

An Alford plea is a type of plea deal in criminal court where the defendant admits guilt to the charges against them while maintaining their innocence. This plea is named after the case North Carolina v. Alford.

Unlike a nolo contendere plea, where the defendant does not admit guilt or innocence, an Alford plea involves a formal admission of guilt. The defendant agrees to accept the punishment for the charges without going through a full criminal trial.

However, the admission of guilt in an Alford plea can be used against the defendant in future legal proceedings. It is up to the prosecutor and judge to decide if they will offer an Alford plea as a plea bargain.

John is accused of robbery. He maintains his innocence but decides to take an Alford plea deal offered by the prosecutor. He admits guilt to the charges and accepts the punishment without going through a full trial.

In this example, John takes an Alford plea deal to avoid a full criminal trial while still maintaining his innocence.

aleatory | algorithm

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:04
90% of your attorneys went to Kent, but what perfect of Kent graduates are working at your firm (or making good money, or if not, getting their loans paid off by Kent)? the latter is, I'd argue, what matters more
i'm sorry i don't quite understand what you mean
16:09
if 90% of attorneys somewhere went to kent but you employ 10 attorneys, thats only 9 attorneys out of a possible 100+ class size at kent
16:09
i think is the point they are trying to get at
OHHH THANK U
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:09
lol thanks you explained better I was typing so much. it's a classic LR logical fallacy/trick, actually
16:10
Okay but clearly the point is that people act like going to a non t14 is a death sentence and it’s not
16:10
Okay but clearly the point is that people act like going to a non t14 is a death sentence and it’s not
16:10
yeah its not
16:10
i was only responding to that one specific thing i havent scrolled up
@esoterica: THAT'S WHAT i'M SAYING THANK U!!! my point was that you will be fine where you end up ❤️
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:11
100%, that's why I think the sub is untethered to reality. but/and I was aiming for tippy top schools, and I think it's not wild to have that goal if you have reasons :)
16:11
many people have different ideas of what a good outcome would be and have even more different ideas of what amount of work they would like to put to get there
Any acceptances today?
16:12
nop
16:12
couple yesterday
NosyBeagle
16:13
@DivergentBoundlessHuman: help i thought u meant BL as in boy love and not big law
NosyBeagle
16:13
it appears i have yaoi on the brain
16:13
Reddit in particular is so myopic about outcomes, there are large portions of the country where making 80k still gives you a comfortable life, and ~80k is often cited as the low end of the bimodal distribution of private attorney salaries
not saying reaching for a t-14 is a wild thing to do!!!! man i would go to nyu. i'm simply stating what esoterica said, people that act like not being at a t-14 means your life is over is simply not correct. but i think anyone outside of reddit would understand that.
fujos after stubbing their toe: YAOI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AngryMiniCar
16:16
LMAOO @badhorrormovie where did that even come from
AngryMiniCar
16:17
Also someone linked a redditpost here for RC wrong answer journals. I forgot who it was can you do it again :')
BEAGLE SAID YAOI and that popped into my brain i had to say something 💔 ,, also here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/v7w3ay/wrong_answer_guide_for_rc/
AngryMiniCar
16:25
THANK YOU!
UR WELCOME!!!! u will master rc we believe in u
AngryMiniCar
16:28
<3
let us take a moment to think about how the lsat was 10 sections when it was first created....glad they don't do that anymore that's for sure
I got a 164, which was 3 points higher than my all-time highest PT. so I'm good
16:41
i love u bad horror movie
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.