tl;dr: A tastemaker granted the plaintiff exclusive authority to lend her endorsement to clothing designs, but then made endorsements without his knowledge. Their contract was enforceable because, although he made no explicit promise, one was fairly implied.
IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
Facts & Holding
Facts:Wood (plaintiff) sued Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon (defendant) for breach of...
Holding:It is true that Wood did not make an explicit...
🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD
Bertie: I know this is kind of weird, but I've been reading this chat all cycle long as a MOM, and I CANNOT EXPRESS to you how much I've been rooting for you. You have been such a force of positivity, support, and good humor for everyone else all cycle long. All I wanted was for you to get into W&L because you so deserved it. This news has literally MADE MY DAY. This is absolutely the response you deserved for all the good karma you've shown to everyone else. You are going to do so well. Con
reversesplittercore
16:39
Haha I hope acceptances. I imagine they may move closer to to their letter intent though.