tl;dr: The parties entered into a contract with a reciprocal cancellation policy and a merger clause, though Plaintiff insists that the cancellation clause was for their benefit, due to active litigation against Defendant. Defendant used the clause for itself.
IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
Facts & Holding
Facts:Plaintiff and Defendants entered into a contract with a reciprocal...
Holding:Reversed, summary judgment granted for Defendants. There is no ambiguity...
🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD
I am still kind of biased toward the Clifton Forge area so that I can live with my girlfriend, but am definitely starting to consider places around lexington out of necessity\