Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. Giancontieri

77 N.Y.2d 157 (Ct. App. N.Y. 1990)

tl;dr: The parties entered into a contract with a reciprocal cancellation policy and a merger clause, though Plaintiff insists that the cancellation clause was for their benefit, due to active litigation against Defendant. Defendant used the clause for itself.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff and Defendants entered into a contract with a reciprocal...

Holding:Reversed, summary judgment granted for Defendants. There is no ambiguity...

W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. Giancontieri

Chat for W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. Giancontieri
brief-207
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you