Table of Contents
UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.


Florida District Court of Appeal - 212 So. 2d 906


A dance company (allegedly) took advantage of a recent widow in her fifties by selling her more dance classes than she could use in a lifetime. The dance company promised her that she was improving and that the dance lessons were working.

Video Summary

Case Summary

In the 1968 case Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc., Audrey Vokes, a 51-year-old widow, sued a dance school company and one of its franchisees, J.P. Davenport, for canceling several contracts for dance lessons and expenses. Vokes claimed that she was tricked into signing up for multiple dance courses by the constant praise of her dancing skills and progress. Vokes only realized she lacked talent after being ridiculed at a dance festival in Miami. She wanted to cancel the contracts and get her money back.

The trial court initially dismissed her complaint, but the appellate court reversed the decision, stating that Vokes had a valid reason for rescission based on fraud and misrepresentation. The court used the fraud test, which determines if one party intentionally deceives another through false statements or hiding important information.

The appellate court found that Vokes provided sufficient evidence that Davenport and his associates lied about her abilities, influencing her decision to sign the contracts. These statements were not opinions or exaggerations, but facts that could be proven true or false. The court argued that Davenport and his associates had an obligation to disclose the truth about Vokes' dancing skills.

This case is significant because it demonstrates the legal concept of fraud and misrepresentation, which allows for the cancellation of a contract if one party is deceived by another. Fraud and misrepresentation differ from mistake, duress or undue influence, and they emphasize the importance of trust and honesty in contracts.

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingVokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc. case brief facts & holding

Facts:Plaintiff Vokes, a widow in her fifties who had always...

Holding:Reversed. Plaintiff is entitled to her day in court because...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc. | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: PIERCE, Judge.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The plaintiff, Vokes, alleges that she was deceived and defrauded by the defendants, Arthur Murray's School of Dancing, into purchasing over 2300 hours of dance lessons for over $31,000 through false statements, undue influence, and deceptive sales techniques. Vokes claims that the contracts should not be enforced due to the defendants' unconscionable conduct. The lower court dismissed Vokes' complaint, but the higher court reversed the decision, stating that contracts can be rescinded for fraud or misrepresentation, even if the alleged misrepresentation is an opinion or expectation. The court held that the plaintiff's complaint alleges enough factors to warrant her day in court, and the order dismissing her complaint with prejudice is reversed.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs


  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.


DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.

Chat for Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.