Warning

Info

πŸ… UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.

212 So. 2d 906 (DC of App. Fla. 1968)

tl;dr: A dance company (allegedly) took advantage of a recent widow in her fifties by selling her more dance classes than she could use in a lifetime. The dance company promised her that she was improving and that the dance lessons were working.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🀯 High points 🀯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Vokes, a widow in her fifties who had always...

Holding:Reversed. Plaintiff is entitled to her day in court because...

Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.

Chat for Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
brief-185
πŸ‘ Chat vibe: 0 πŸ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you