Warning

Info

πŸ… Jawshu, CLS '24 |

0 0

Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises

492 N.E.2d 756 (1986)

tl;dr: A building owner improperly canceled a lease with the plaintiff. The court ordered the owner to pay damages instead of carrying out the contract.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🀯 High points 🀯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Van Wagner Advertising (plaintiff) sued S & M Enterprises (defendant)...

Holding:Van Wagner argues that specific performance should be granted because...

Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises

Chat for Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises
brief-58
πŸ‘ Chat vibe: 0 πŸ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you