🏅 Jawshu, CLS '24 |

Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises

492 N.E.2d 756 (1986)

tl;dr: A building owner improperly canceled a lease with the plaintiff. The court ordered the owner to pay damages instead of carrying out the contract.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Van Wagner Advertising (plaintiff) sued S & M Enterprises (defendant)...

Holding:Van Wagner argues that specific performance should be granted because...

Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises

Chat for Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises

Brief General >T14 Big mad

Warning

Info

Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Van Wagner Advertising (plaintiff) sued S & M Enterprises (defendant)...

Holding:Van Wagner argues that specific performance should be granted because...

Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M Enterprises

Help us make LSD better!