LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.
Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Back to briefs

US v. Darby

312 U.S. 100 (1941)

tl;dr: Upholds prohibition of shipment of goods on basis of substandard labor conditions using the substantial effects test.

1L is really, really hard. Save time, crush cold calls, and excel on exams with LSD's AI case briefs.

We simplify dense legal cases into easy-to-understand summaries, helping you master legal complexities and excel in your studies.

AI Deep DiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Level 1
Click below 👇 to deep dive

The case of United States v. Darby involved the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and whether Congress had the power to regulate the shipment of goods produced by employees who were paid less than a minimum wage or worked more than a maximum number of hours. The defendant was accused of violating the Act and challenged its validity, arguing that it was unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause and the Fifth and Tenth Amendments. The district court quashed the indictment, but the case is now on direct appeal to the Supreme Court. The purpose of the Act is to prevent the shipment of certain products produced under labor conditions that do not meet the standards set by the Act and to establish an administrative procedure for modifying these standards. The government is appealing the district court decision, arguing that Congress has complete power over interstate commerce, including the power to prohibit it and exclude articles from it if they are harmful to public health, morals, or welfare. The decision in Hammer v. Dagenhart, which held that Congress lacked the power to exclude child labor products from interstate commerce, was in conflict with the Court's plenary power under the Commerce Clause. The federal government's authority over interstate commerce is not different from the states' authority over intrastate commerce.

The Hammer v. Dagenhart case is no longer valid. Congress has the power to regulate intrastate activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce through appropriate legislation. Section 15(a)(2) of the Fair Labor Standards Act is valid and aims to suppress unfair competition in interstate commerce that spreads substandard labor conditions. The Tenth Amendment does not limit the national government's authority to use appropriate means to exercise a granted power. The minimum wage and overtime provisions of the law are valid under the Fifth Amendment and apply equally to both men and women. Employers who do not comply with the prescribed wage and hour conditions for goods shipped across state lines may face criminal penalties. The lower court's decision is reversed.

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

Facts & Holding

Facts:Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to prevent...

Holding:Purpose of act is to exclude goods produced under conditions...

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

US v. Darby

Chat for US v. Darby
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.