🏅 Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

US v. Carroll Towing Co.

159 F.2d 169 (2d. Cir. 1947)

tl;dr: Plaintiff's barge sank due to Defendant's negligence, but if Plaintiff had had a bargee on board, it could have prevented injury. Court holds that Plaintiff can be held liable for its failure to have a bargee on board.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Employees of Defendant Carroll were negligent in securing a barge...

Holding:The Court of Appeals reversed.They applied the Learned Hand Formula,...

US v. Carroll Towing Co.

Chat for US v. Carroll Towing Co.
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you