Warning

Info

🏅 Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

United States v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co., et al.

100 F.R.D. 78 (1983)

tl;dr: This case is an example of dismissal of a motion to intervene on the basis of FRCP 24(a)(2).

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:The US filed a “Notice of Condemnation” affecting nearly 37...

Holding:The motion to intervene is deniedThe court analyzes the four...

United States v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co., et al.

Chat for United States v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co., et al.
brief-302
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you