Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 Pilea, HLS '24 |
0
0
United States v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co., et al.
100 F.R.D. 78 (1983)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Civil Procedure
,
Intervention
tl;dr:
This case is an example of dismissal of a motion to intervene on the basis of FRCP 24(a)(2).
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
The US filed a “Notice of Condemnation” affecting nearly 37...
Holding:
The motion to intervene is deniedThe court analyzes the four...
United States v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co., et al.
Chat for United States v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co., et al.
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-302
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you