Warning

Info

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.
Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Back to briefs

United States v. Alvarez

178 L.Ed 2d 223 (2010)

tl;dr: Circumstantial evidence of agreement, inferred from the defendant's overt acts furthering the conspiracy, are sufficient to sustain a conviction.

1L is really, really hard. Save time, crush cold calls, and excel on exams with LSD's AI case briefs.

We simplify dense legal cases into easy-to-understand summaries, helping you master legal complexities and excel in your studies.

AI Deep DiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Level 1
Click below ๐Ÿ‘‡ to deep dive

The Supreme Court reviewed the case of Uiese Mausali v. United States on October 4, 2010, which dealt with federal law and the petitioner's rights. The request for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to review the case was rejected, and the decision of the lower court (590 F.3d 1077) remains in effect.

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

Facts & Holding

Facts:The defendant had helped unload household items with drugs hidden...

Holding:The court held that the conviction was proper because the...

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

United States v. Alvarez

Chat for United States v. Alvarez
brief-741
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.