Warning
Info
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.
Tags: Criminal law, Conspiracy
tl;dr: Circumstantial evidence of agreement, inferred from the defendant's overt acts furthering the conspiracy, are sufficient to sustain a conviction.
1L is really, really hard. Save time, crush cold calls, and excel on exams with LSD's AI case briefs.
We simplify dense legal cases into easy-to-understand summaries, helping you master legal complexities and excel in your studies.
AI Deep DiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition
Font size -+
Level 1
Click below 👇 to deep dive
The Supreme Court reviewed the case of Uiese Mausali v. United States on October 4, 2010, which dealt with federal law and the petitioner's rights. The request for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to review the case was rejected, and the decision of the lower court (590 F.3d 1077) remains in effect.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.
IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.
Facts & Holding
Facts:The defendant had helped unload household items with drugs hidden...
Holding:The court held that the conviction was proper because the...
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.