Queen's Bench in England - 122 Eng. Rep. 309
In Taylor v. Caldwell (1863), concert promoters Taylor and Lewis sued music hall owners Caldwell and Bishop for breach of contract. The promoters had agreed to rent the music hall for four days, and the owners were supposed to prepare and maintain it. However, an accidental fire destroyed the music hall before the events, with neither party responsible for the fire.
The promoters sued for damages, stating that they had incurred expenses and lost profits. The owners argued the contract was frustrated by the fire, which made performance impossible. The trial court sided with the owners, and the Queen's Bench in England upheld that decision. They held that the contract was indeed frustrated by the fire, which they considered an unforeseen event, making performance impossible. The agreed events could not take place in another venue, and since neither party breached the contract, no damages were awarded.
This case highlights the legal principle of frustration, which excuses performance on a contract if an unforeseen event makes it impossible or radically different from what the parties initially agreed upon. Frustration acknowledges that contracts can be affected by changing circumstances and excuses parties from contractual obligations when events beyond their control make performance impractical or unjust.
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.