Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ Lan, SLS '24 |
0
0
Summers v. Tice
33 Cal. 2d 80 (1948)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Torts
,
Alternative liability
tl;dr:
Plaintiff was shot in the eye by one of two Defendants, unclear which; Court holds that both Defendants can be held liable.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Defendants Tice and Simonson were hunting quail when both fired...
Holding:
The California Supreme Court affirmed.In cases like this one, clearly...
Summers v. Tice
Chat for Summers v. Tice
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-605
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you