Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

Summers v. Tice

33 Cal. 2d 80 (1948)

tl;dr: Plaintiff was shot in the eye by one of two Defendants, unclear which; Court holds that both Defendants can be held liable.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendants Tice and Simonson were hunting quail when both fired...

Holding:The California Supreme Court affirmed.In cases like this one, clearly...

Summers v. Tice

Chat for Summers v. Tice
brief-605
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you