Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |
0
0
Strong v. Sheffield
39 N.E. 330 (N.Y. 1895)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Contracts
,
Illusory promises
,
Consideration
tl;dr:
Plaintiff sold a business to Defendant's husband on credit and promised not to collect on the debt until he felt like he needed/wanted the money.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Strong (Plaintiff) sold his business to his niece’s (Defendant) husband...
Holding:
Affirmed. The terms of the promise left the decision of...
Strong v. Sheffield
Chat for Strong v. Sheffield
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-159
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you