Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

Strauss v. Belle Realty Co.

65 N.Y.2d 399 (1985)

tl;dr: Plaintiff fell due to poor lighting in a common area of his building; Court holds that utility company could not be held liable due to the lack of contractual relationship between Plaintiff and utility company.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Strauss lived in an apartment serviced by Defendant utility...

Holding:The New York Court of Appeals affirmed.The Court relied on...

Strauss v. Belle Realty Co.

Chat for Strauss v. Belle Realty Co.
brief-526
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you