🏅 Jawshu, CLS '24 |

0 0

Spiess v. Brandt

41 N.W.2d 561 (1950)

tl;dr: The plaintiffs bought a resort from the defendants, relying upon the defendants’ claim that the resort was profitable. The resort was not profitable, and the defendants were found to have made a fraudulent misrepresentation.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Lowell and Maurice Spiess (plaintiffs, brothers) alleged that the Brandts...

Holding:The court only needs to consider the Brandts’ representation that...

Spiess v. Brandt

Chat for Spiess v. Brandt
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you