Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ Chris22, HLS '22 |
0
0
Shelley v. Kraemer
334 U.S. 1 (1948)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Property
,
Constitutional law
,
Covenants
tl;dr:
Private covenants that are racially restrictive violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
A neighborhood in St. Louis, Missouri, put a racially restrictive...
Holding:
The court reasoned that the covenant alone did not violate...
Shelley v. Kraemer
Chat for Shelley v. Kraemer
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-570
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you