Warning

Info

🏅 Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 1

Shaffer v. Heitner

433 U.S. 186, 97 S.Ct. 2569, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977)

tl;dr: A state may not exercise personal jurisdiction over company officers on the basis of their personal property (stocks in their company) being located in the forum state, absent additional minimum contacts with the state.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff/appellee (Heitner) owns one stock in Greyhound Corp. (GC)GC is...

Holding:All assertions of state-court jurisdiction must be evaluated according to...

Shaffer v. Heitner

Chat for Shaffer v. Heitner
brief-39
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you