Warning
Info
- - tl;dr
- - ICRA
- - Facts & Holding
- - DeepDive
0 0
District of Columbia Court of Appeals - 652 A.2d 1098
Tags: Criminal law, Accomplice liability
tl;dr:
An accomplice cannot be held liable for a crime that was not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the conspiracy.Video Summary
DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition
Nakia A. Roy and Steve B. Ross were convicted of armed robbery, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence, and carrying a pistol without a license. Ross was also convicted of obstruction of justice. Roy appealed, alleging instructional error, and Ross claimed that the judge erred in denying his motion to sever offenses. The court found that the evidence was insufficient to support Roy's convictions of armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence, but affirmed his conviction for carrying a pistol without a license and all of Ross's convictions. The trial judge expressed doubts about the extent of liability under Theory B, which holds Roy vicariously liable for the armed robbery if it was a natural and probable consequence of his aiding and abetting the illegal act of selling a gun. The judge recognized the need to balance the principle of aiding and abetting with the requirement of mens rea for a criminal offense. The judge believes that the alternative doctrine of aiding and abetting, which the government is relying on in Roy's case, is supported by case law but needs to be re-examined by the Court of Appeals. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is reviewing the trial judge's denial of Roy's motion for judgment of acquittal.
LSD+ Case Briefs
Features
- DeepDive for detailed case analysis
- Over 50,000 existing case briefs
- Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
- Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
- Social learning with chat and high points
Over 50,000 Cases Briefed
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
14-Day Free Trial
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Integrated Legal Dictionary
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Brief anything. Instantly.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Social Learning with Chat and High Points
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Real-Time Brief Feedback
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.