Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.

35 F.2d 301 (4th Cir. 1929)

tl;dr: Plaintiff constructed a bridge it agreed to construct for Defendant even after Defendant explicitly told Plaintiff that the deal was off. Then Plaintiff sued for the costs it incurred from the construction.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant voted to approve a contract with Plaintiff whereby a...

Holding:Reversed and remanded. After Plaintiff receives notice of breach, Plaintiff...

Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.

Chat for Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.
brief-247
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you