🏅 Jawshu, CLS '24 |

0 0

Ricketts v. Scothorn

77 N.W. 365 (1898)

tl;dr: A man promised his granddaughter $2,000. Even though there was no consideration, the promise was enforceable because the granddaughter quit her job in reliance on it.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Katie Scothorn (plaintiff) sued the executor of her grandfather’s estate,...

Holding:The grandfather’s note was not given in consideration of Scothorn...

Ricketts v. Scothorn

Chat for Ricketts v. Scothorn
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you