Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ Pilea, HLS '24 |
0
0
Podhorn v. Paragon Group, Inc.
606 F. Supp. 185 (1985)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Civil Procedure
,
Compulsory Counterclaim
tl;dr:
This case illustrates FRCP 13, and the four tests that must be applied to determine if a counterclaim is compulsory.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Paragon Group filed a petition in circuit court for late...
Holding:
The Podhorns were required to file a counter claim, and...
Podhorn v. Paragon Group, Inc.
Chat for Podhorn v. Paragon Group, Inc.
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-297
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you