Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Podhorn v. Paragon Group, Inc.

606 F. Supp. 185 (1985)

tl;dr: This case illustrates FRCP 13, and the four tests that must be applied to determine if a counterclaim is compulsory.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Paragon Group filed a petition in circuit court for late...

Holding:The Podhorns were required to file a counter claim, and...

Podhorn v. Paragon Group, Inc.

Chat for Podhorn v. Paragon Group, Inc.
brief-297
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you