🏅 Okapi13, SLS '24 |

Peter Wallis v. Kellie Rae Smith

130 N.M. 214 (Court of Appeals of New Mexico, 2001)

tl;dr: Public policy interests in encouraging child support outweigh a claim of “contraceptive fraud” from a father against a mother who stopped taking birth control.

Warning

Info

Peter Wallis v. Kellie Rae Smith

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Wallis and Defendant Smith agreed to have sex on...

Holding:The court dismissed Wallis' fraud claim, holding that public policy...

Peter Wallis v. Kellie Rae Smith

Help us make LSD better!