Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ Pilea, HLS '24 |
0
0
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
439 U.S. 322, 99 S.Ct. 645 (1979)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Civil Procedure
,
Nonmutual Issue Preclusion
tl;dr:
This case holds that trial courts should be granted broad discretion to determine when offensive collateral estoppel applies.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Parklane Hosiery Co. was found guilty of misrepresentation during a...
Holding:
Nonmutual issue preclusion may or may not be permitted at...
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
Chat for Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-322
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you