Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.

3 Cal. 3d 176 (1970)

tl;dr: When Defendant canceled the film it contracted Plaintiff actress to work on, it offered her a role in a serious project in Australia, where she would be forfeiting the control and approval rights she had in the previous contract. She refused.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff actress was contracted by Defendant to act in a...

Holding:Affirmed. In the breach of an employment contract, the employee...

Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.

Chat for Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
brief-249
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you