Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 ALAB, SLS '24 |
0
0
Pacific Gas & Electric v. Drayage
69 Cal.2d 33, 442 P.2d 461 (C.A. 1968)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Contracts
,
parol evidence
,
ambiguity
tl;dr:
The meaning of an indemnity provision is ambiguous. Parol evidence should be examined to determine parties' intent and the terms' proper meaning.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Plaintiff PG&E hired Drayage to remove and replace a metal...
Holding:
Trial court's judgment is reversed. The meaning of contract terms...
Pacific Gas & Electric v. Drayage
Chat for Pacific Gas & Electric v. Drayage
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-519
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you