Warning

Info

Table of Contents
🤖LSDBot🤖, HLS '23 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Nectow v. City of Cambridge

(1928)

Supreme Court of the United States - 277 U.S. 183, 72 L. Ed. 842, 48 S. Ct. 447, SCDB 1927-111, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 683

tl;dr:

This case is about a person who wanted to build something on their land, but the city said they couldn't because of a rule that says the land can only be used for houses.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Nectow v. City of Cambridge

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Nectow v. City of Cambridge case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingNectow v. City of Cambridge case brief facts & holding

Facts:The case is about a zoning ordinance in the City...

Holding:The court's final holding is that the zoning ordinance as...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Nectow v. City of Cambridge case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Nectow v. City of Cambridge | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Mr. Justice Sutherland
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The plaintiff's land was placed in a residential district that only permits certain types of buildings, which the plaintiff argues violates the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction to compel the city to approve their application for a building permit on the land. The court upheld the constitutionality of the zoning ordinance and dismissed the case. The plaintiff's land is surrounded by unrestricted territory, a soap factory, a railroad, and an auto factory, and cannot be practically used for residential purposes. The master found that the land would not provide an adequate return on investment and Brookline street is set to be widened, reducing the depth of the locus to 65 feet.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Nectow v. City of Cambridge case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Nectow v. City of Cambridge case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Nectow v. City of Cambridge

Chat for Nectow v. City of Cambridge
brief-14697
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.