🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

Nanakuli Paving and Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Company, Inc.

664 F.2d 772 (9th Cir. 1981)

Tags: Contracts, Interpretation, Ambiguity, Course of performance, Trade usage, Usage of trade

tl;dr: Defendant had price protected Plaintiff on two previous occasions, but then refused to price protect Plaintiff from a price increase on the third occasion.

Warning

Info

Nanakuli Paving and Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Company, Inc.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Nanakuli had an agreement with Defendant Shell Oil Co....

Holding:Reversed. When one looks at the context of the whole...

Nanakuli Paving and Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Company, Inc.

Help us make LSD better!