Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Nanakuli Paving and Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Company, Inc.

664 F.2d 772 (9th Cir. 1981)

tl;dr: Defendant had price protected Plaintiff on two previous occasions, but then refused to price protect Plaintiff from a price increase on the third occasion.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Nanakuli had an agreement with Defendant Shell Oil Co....

Holding:Reversed. When one looks at the context of the whole...

Nanakuli Paving and Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Company, Inc.

Chat for Nanakuli Paving and Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Company, Inc.
brief-211
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you