Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Mugaas v. Smith

206 P.2d 332 (1949)

tl;dr: An adverse possessor has a better claim to title than a subsequent purchaser for value with a valid recorded deed.

AI Deep Dive

Font size -+

Searching for case text.

This will automatically update when the deep dive is ready.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:In 1910, the plaintiff began using a strip of land...

Holding:The court granted the plaintiff quiet title to the land,...

Mugaas v. Smith

Chat for Mugaas v. Smith
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you