Warning

Info

🏅 Okapi13, SLS '24 |

0 0

Morris Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store

251 Minn. 188 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1957)

tl;dr: Advertisements with definite terms are offers which cannot be unexpectedly modified to prevent acceptance.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant GMSS published a newspaper advertisement stating that on the...

Holding:The Supreme Court of Minnesota affirmed the ruling below, granting...

Morris Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store

Chat for Morris Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store
brief-86
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you