🏅 Jawshu, CLS '24 |

0 0

Monetti v. Anchor Hocking Corp.

931 F.2d 1178 (7th Cir. 1991)

tl;dr: A company agreed to become the distributor for another company, but then breached. Even though they did not sign a contract, they were held liable because they had signed other written proof of the agreement.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Monetti, S.P.A. (plaintiff) sued Anchor Hocking Corp. (defendant) for breach...

Holding:There is nothing under the UCC statute of frauds that...

Monetti v. Anchor Hocking Corp.

Chat for Monetti v. Anchor Hocking Corp.
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you