Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances

11 N.Y.2d 62 (1962)

tl;dr: Defendant's product was used incorrectly by a fireman, resulting in serious injuries to a child; Court holds that fireman's disregard of instructions could constitute a superseding cause that defeats proximate cause.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:A 6-year-old child almost drowned while bathing in a lake....

Holding:The Court reversed.The Court held that if Traxler knew and...

McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances

Chat for McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances
brief-543
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you