Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

McDougald v. Garber

73 N.Y.2d 246 (1989)

tl;dr: The jury awarded damages for loss of enjoyment of life and pain and suffering to Plaintiff in a coma; Court holds that both should be considered under pain and suffering, and that recovery requires an aware Plaintiff.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant's malpractice left Plaintiff Emma McDougald in a "permanently comatose...

Holding:The New York Court of Appeals reversed.The Court notes that...

McDougald v. Garber

Chat for McDougald v. Garber
brief-624
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you