Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

1 0

MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.

217 N.Y. 382 (1916)

tl;dr: Defendant sold a car to a retail dealer without inspecting the wheels, and Plaintiff who purchased the car from the retail dealer was injured in an accident; Court holds Defendant owed duty to Plaintiff despite lack of privity.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant Buick manufactured a car that was sold to a...

Holding:The New York Court of Appeals affirmed.The Court cited Thomas...

MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.

Chat for MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
brief-615
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you