tl;dr: Defendant sold a car to a retail dealer without inspecting the wheels, and Plaintiff who purchased the car from the retail dealer was injured in an accident; Court holds Defendant owed duty to Plaintiff despite lack of privity.
IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
Facts & Holding
Facts:Defendant Buick manufactured a car that was sold to a...
Holding:The New York Court of Appeals affirmed.The Court cited Thomas...
🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD
Bertie: I know this is kind of weird, but I've been reading this chat all cycle long as a MOM, and I CANNOT EXPRESS to you how much I've been rooting for you. You have been such a force of positivity, support, and good humor for everyone else all cycle long. All I wanted was for you to get into W&L because you so deserved it. This news has literally MADE MY DAY. This is absolutely the response you deserved for all the good karma you've shown to everyone else. You are going to do so well. Con
reversesplittercore
16:39
Haha I hope acceptances. I imagine they may move closer to to their letter intent though.