🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Langer v. Superior Steel Corp.

161 A. 571 (P.A. 1932)

tl;dr: A company promised to pay a retiring employee $100 for the rest of his life as long as he agreed not to work for a competitor, but the company stopped paying after 4 years.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant company Superior Steel Corp. promised to pay Plaintiff Langer,...

Holding:Reversed. Consideration exists when one party agrees to do something...

Langer v. Superior Steel Corp.

Chat for Langer v. Superior Steel Corp.
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you