Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Laclede Gas Co. v. Amoco Oil Co.

522 F.2d 33 (8th Cir. 1975)

tl;dr: The parties contracted regarding a propane delivery subsystem. Defendant was the exclusive provider to Plaintiff and Plaintiff had the exclusive right to cancel. Then, Defendant tried to raise prices during a propane shortage.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff contracted with Defendant to organize propane delivery subsystems for...

Holding:Reversed and remanded. The fact that a contract does not...

Laclede Gas Co. v. Amoco Oil Co.

Chat for Laclede Gas Co. v. Amoco Oil Co.
brief-239
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you